This Q&A addresses two major concerns about Nuclear Plant 4 restart: equipment idling and spare parts obsolescence. The article clarifies that Nuclear Plant 4 is 'sealed not abandoned' with proper maintenance, and restart faces no equipment availability issues. Regarding spare parts, Nuclear Plant 4 is relatively modern and replacement parts just need international certification. The article concludes that the key to restart isn't engineering details but 'attitude'—with determination, all problems are solvable; without it, society will waste years on nothing.
This article comments on the 2021 Taiwan referendum results, arguing that the referendum has devolved into a test of 'choosing sides' and 'party loyalty' rather than a pure expression of public will. The author expresses admiration for a party member who 'followed public opinion' and views the results as a product of the current political situation. The piece questions the significance of the 'Restart Nuclear Plant 4' referendum, arguing that the disposal of nuclear waste is the core, unsolvable issue. Regarding the ractopamine pork issue, the author suggests viewing it through the lens of international 'reciprocity' and criticizes politicians for politicizing every issue and exploiting public anxiety. He calls for unity and logical thinking among Taiwanese to avoid being puppets of political parties, viewing the referendum as a waste of taxpayer money.